Posted Jul 3rd 2009 9:03PM by Jeffrey M. Anderson
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Columns, 400 Screens, 400 Blows, War
A few months ago, I saw two new sci-fi movies at the San Francisco International Film Festival, and now both are in limited release: Duncan Jones's
Moon (21 screens) and Aristomenis Tsirbas' Battle for Terra (2 screens). And it got me thinking. These two movies couldn't be more different, and the main distinction between them is this. Moon is sci-fi based on an actual sci-fi idea. That means that science actually figures into the fiction somewhere. And Battle for Terra is the perfect example of a war film decorated with sci-fi trimmings; its big "twist" is that the humans are the bad guys and the aliens are the good guys, but aside from that the story unfolds exactly like a regular war film. The aliens, spaceships and other gizmos don't really figure into the major themes or plot.
It got me thinking about how many science fiction movies are really just war movies in disguise. (The current Terminator Salvation is another one.) It's very easy to transform the combatants of a war to alien races and make the cause of the war something fictitious, like the "spice" in Dune (1984). It's much easier to explain why people are fighting over that powerful stuff than why they're fighting over differences in religions or beliefs. And it's much nicer to justify battling alien invaders than it is to justify humans fighting humans. Frankly, I'm all for this little bit of deception, provided the sci-fi movies have three things. Battle for Terra has none of them.
Continue reading 400 Screens, 400 Blows - Sci-Fi Goes to War
Posted Jul 3rd 2009 1:32PM by Monika Bartyzel
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Fandom, Remakes and Sequels, Trailers and Clips

Did you watch the
New Moon trailer and wonder if wolfy Jacob would've been any more scary if he could morph into a little guinea pig?
You may have noticed that little hairy beasts are fighting their way to the big screen later this month with
G-Force. To help kick off the film, which opens on July 24,
Electric Spoofaloo has been holding a
contest. Viewers pitch ideas for spoof trailers featuring the little hairy beasts, they're voted on, and then the site makes the pitches come to life.
There's a faux
Harry Potter that isn't all that funny, but Spoofaloo really hits the nail on the head with their take on the
New Moon trailer (which you can see after the jump). It works so well that it seems like Stephanie Meyer's world was just destined for guineadom. There's the dramatic kiss, and then Bella's cataclysmic paper cut that sends her whole life into upheaval. (Whoever knew that paper could be so destructive? Good thing no one ever got one at school during the few years Jasper went to Forks High.)
From beginning to end, it's all there, right down to a ridiculously beefy guy filling in for Taylor Lautner and exploding into a guinea pig -- one that looks just as frightening as that big, fluffy wolf. How sad is it when your menacing animal can be easily replaced by a hand-held pet? I mean, I have a tendency to think lots of scary animals look cute, but that's the least menacing movie wolf I've ever seen!
Continue reading Guinew Moon -- Piggy 'Twilight' Spoof
Posted Jul 3rd 2009 12:02PM by Erik Davis
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Newsstand, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
.jpg)
Seems like a small war is starting to brew between
Michael Bay and
Megan Fox, after the latter said some unflattering things about
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, telling
the Early Show recently that she still doesn't understand the movie and that it's apparently made for geniuses. Bay, of course, is not one to take criticism lightly -- especially from some girl who was nobody until he dropped her into the first
Transformers movie.
Speaking to
The Wall Street Journal about the situation with Fox, he says, "Well, that's Megan Fox for you. She says some very ridiculous things because she's 23 years old and she still has a lot of growing to do. You roll your eyes when you see statements like that and think, "Okay Megan, you can do whatever you want. I got it." But I 100% disagree with her. Nick Cage wasn't a big actor when I cast him, nor was Ben Affleck before I put him in "Armageddon." Shia LaBeouf wasn't a big movie star before he did "Transformers"-and then he exploded. Not to mention Will Smith and Martin Lawrence, from "Bad Boys." Nobody in the world knew about Megan Fox until I found her and put her in "Transformers." I like to think that I've had some luck in building actors' careers with my films."
We shouldn't worry whether this war of words will hurt either person's involvement in a third
Transformers movie because according to Bay that's not happening anytime soon. On a third
Transformers film, he says, "I just want to take some time off. It's been almost three years that I've devoted myself entirely to this world of robots. At some point, enough is enough-and I literally carried this movie on my back. ... I don't know who [would] want to take on my shoes with this franchise. We might just take a year down."
Continue reading Michael Bay Trashes Megan Fox, Talks 'Transformers 3' and 3D
Posted Jul 3rd 2009 10:32AM by Elisabeth Rappe
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Paramount, DIY/Filmmaking, Newsstand, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels, Images
Here's a bit of geeky fun for your Fourth of July weekend. (And frankly, anything
Jon Favreau is Re-Tweeting is worth posting.)
Road and Track Magazine caught a spy photo of Tony Stark's stylish racecar sitting all by its lonesome on the
Iron Man 2 set. The magazine reports that they've recreated the Grand Prix de Monaco on a very elaborate set that copies the Monaco circuit.
I know what you're thinking "A racecar? That's ok, I guess." It's not news that they did a scene set in Monaco either. But what you might have forgotten is that this is where
Mickey Rourke's Whiplash makes his first appearence, undoubtedly shocking the wealthy racing fans with his prison tats, reactor whips, and overall terrifying demeanor. Also,
Road and Track reveals a hint as to how that showdown gets underway, because with Tony Stark being the sort of dashing billionaire he is, he isn't just attending the race -- he's driving that very car in it. Something tells me it gets stopped by a big Russian ex-con ... and since this
is Iron Man, the car probably explodes in the ensuing battle.
I know, it isn't much, but it's something to build on. San Diego ComicCon is only a few weeks away, and this dry spell of hints and glimpses will be forgotten.
Posted Jul 2nd 2009 12:03PM by Scott Weinberg
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, 20th Century Fox, Remakes and Sequels

Lots of movie geeks (yes, like us) have been abuzz with the vague discussions regarding the
Predator remake / reboot / sequel / whatever. All we really knew was that the generally kick-ass Robert Rodriguez was on board to oversee, as the producer, but now we have confirmation have Robert's
good pal that the director has been named. And that name ... is Nimrod.
Nimrod Antal, to be precise, who fest-goers will know from
Kontroll and thriller fans will recall from
Vacancy. Harry's got a whole bunch of cool info on the project
right here, but I've chosen a small segment that makes me particularly happy: "It involves a very intense group of people stranded on a Predator planet discovering unspeakable horrors." Yes! Plus Mr. Rodriguez shares some enthusiasm from a Fox colleague: "No one is going to talk about
AVP again after this movie. I stake my life on it."
Hell, just give us a knock-down, drag-out Predator fest with a few meaty characters, a whole lot of action, and maybe a few storytelling hooks. That'll make a whole lot of people happy. Speaking only for myself, heck, I thought both of Antal's films were darn good, so I've no reason to doubt RR's call on this one!
Posted Jun 30th 2009 12:45PM by Erik Davis
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Fandom, Images
.jpg)
Some more concept art from Tim Burton's upcoming Alice in Wonderland film has arrived online, courtesy of the French website, The Art of Disney. Some of the art you'll remember from the recent USA Today spread, but then there's other stuff -- like Alice's trip through the giant mushroom patch -- that we haven't yet seen. I attempted to translate the French text on the site (if you speak French, feel free to correct me here), and I believe it talks about how this film will be a continuation of the classic novel, with Alice traveling back to Wonderland 10 years after her original trip.
Directed by Tim Burton, and starring folks like Johnny Depp, Anne Hathaway, Matt Lucas, Christopher Lee, Crispin Glover, Alan Rickman and newcomer Mia Wasikowska as Alice, the film will be a mixture of live-action and animation, and will arrive in theaters on March 5, 2010.
We've added a few of the images to our Alice in Wonderland gallery below, and you can scope out the rest over at The Art of Disney.
[via
AICN]
Posted Jun 30th 2009 10:03AM by Elisabeth Rappe
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Paramount, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Newsstand, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels, Summer Movies, Trailers and Clips
Optimus Prime's entire life has been leading up to this moment ... no, none of that
Revenge of the Fallen stuff, but having
Devin Faraci and
Todd Gilchrist debate his latest installment on
G4's Attack of the Show. Michael Bay's latest robotgasm has been at the center of a lot of debate and controversy all over this great Internet, and while CNN may ignore this crisis of fandom, G4 is right there to report on it.
As you know from hanging around
Cinematical,
Gilchrist liked the film (and was quoted by Roger Ebert in his review). Faraci
hated the film, and was one of the first to really call foul on the racist robots with his scathing
Little Black Sambots piece. I know from reading the comments pouring into
our 1-10 poll that our readers are divided right down the middle on the film's quality and whether or not its employing questionable racist stereotypes. Therefore, you may pick one of these men as your champion, and decide who (if either) comes out victorious, before realizing
Transformers' massive gross doesn't care
what you think.
Watch the video after the jump
Continue reading Watch Cinematical's Todd Gilchrist Debate Devin Faraci On G4!
Posted Jun 29th 2009 10:02PM by Peter Martin
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Paramount, Fandom, Dreamworks, Movie Marketing, Remakes and Sequels, Polls
The numbers are in. Moviegoers worldwide voted with their hard-earned dollars (and euros and other monetary currencies) and elected to go see Michael Bay's Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. Box office receipts placed the sequel at the top of this year's heap o' blockbusters, and by the time all is said and done, the film could rank among the top box office earners of all time. But why did so many people go buy tickets? Why did you?
As pointed out by Eugene Novikov, Transformers 2 "received the most hysterically negative reviews of 2009." Only 21% of reviews by critics at Rotten Tomatoes were positive. (Surprisingly, it fared better at the pickier MetaCritic, with 36% positive.) Eugene acknowledged that it's the kind of movie that defines "critic-proof." So, obviously, critical opinion had no bearing on the box office. Why did this movie hit so big? In his analysis, industry observer David Poland felt that producer Don Murphy and director Michael Bay should be celebrated, the former "for truly believing in this concept being a big home run" and the latter "for understanding the images that will draw massive numbers of people based on 2 minutes or less of images." So was it all about the concept and the trailers?
Marketing obviously plays a huge role in determining how a movie opens, as does, to a somewhat lesser extent, the cast and director. But what was it about Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen that pushed your button(s), elevating it to "must see" status? Take our poll and let us know!
Posted Jun 29th 2009 3:35PM by Erik Davis
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Awards, Fandom, Harry Potter, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels, Oscar Watch
.jpg)
Now that the Academy Awards have extended the best picture category to include ten nominees instead of five, you bet your bottom half we're going to start seeing some pretty bold claims when it comes to fan favorites, like
Star Trek, Watchmen and the upcoming
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. With a couple weeks still to go before
Half-Blood Prince finally hits theaters, Hollywood.com's
Paul Dergarabedian looks to be the first to champion the film for a possible best picture nomination.
Having watched the movie at an advanced screening, he says, "... the Potter loving beast in me has been unleashed after having witnessed a film that was not only exquisite in its production values, but was also charming, funny, scary, enchanting, moving (stop me, the adjectives could go on and on) and dare I say, sexy. Brilliantly directed by David Yates (he directed 2007's "Harry Potter and the Order of The Phoenix"), "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" is a tour-de-force that combines style and substance, special effects and heart and most importantly great performances from all of the actors young and not-so-young. Not only that, half-way through I'm thinking the unthinkable - "ten academy awards nominations are available this year, hmm I wonder...."
Granted, the folks from Hollywood.com could be angling themselves for some Potter quotes in print and in future trailers, but seeing as
Lord of the Rings had its time in the Oscar spotlight -- coupled with the fact that
Potter is nearing his big-screen finale -- I wouldn't be surprised if
Half-Blood Prince nabbed one of those ten spots. You?
Posted Jun 29th 2009 2:45PM by Cinematical staff
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Mystery & Suspense, RumorMonger, Fandom, Newsstand, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
.jpg)
Over on the website TNMC (via AICN), they have up a review of the Star Trek shooting script which picks out and describes the scenes that didn't make the final cut -- scenes that were probably shot and cut for a number of different reasons (pacing, running time, etc ..), but will hopefully arrive on the DVD. It's a shame, too, because some of these scenes seem to address my main problem with the movie: the boring villain, Nero (as played by Eric Bana). The scenes in question (which involve an entire Klingon subplot!) appear to give Nero more depth as a character, so hopefully we'll get to see them eventually. Here are a few descriptions from the site:
"The opening sequence, which sees the destruction of the USS Kelvin at the hands of Nero and his mining ship the Narada, has an extra bit we didn't see. While the Narada is trying to recover from being rammed by the Kelvin, bunches of Klingon warbirds decloak and surround it. This leads to a major subplot entirely removed from the final film."
"Next we go the Rura Penthe Klingon Prison Asteroid where Nero and his crew are being held. The Klingons catch someone trying to smuggle Federation maps to him. The Klingons begin to interrogate Nero, during which we learn that he has been there for ten years and hasn't said a word that whole time. The Klingons have a notebook of his that is full of drawings and calculations relating to Spock and his Jellyfish ship. They decide to use that slug thing we saw Nero using on Captain Pike in the finished film."
Read more at SciFi Squad
Posted Jun 28th 2009 11:02AM by Elisabeth Rappe
Filed under: Action, Classics, Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Thrillers, Casting, Mystery & Suspense, Warner Brothers, RumorMonger, Scripts, DIY/Filmmaking, Newsstand, Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Johnny Depp

A new adaptation (I refuse to use the word remake here) of
Fahrenheit 451 has been in the works for ten years now. I was very excited by the news that Mel Gibson was planning it as a
Braveheart follow-up, as it seemed like that would mark a new and serious phase of his directing career. I wish that was something I could have been right about.
Frank Darabont was the next one to take it on, and he's been attached to it since 2001, rewriting Terry Hayes' script and being delayed by everything from
Indiana Jones IV,
Mission Impossible III,
The Mist, and
Law Abiding Citizen.
SciFi Wire caught up with Darabont at the Saturn Awards, and the director / writer declared that it was really time to get on with it already ... and that it might actually get underway this time, depending on whether or not the Big Name Actor he wants signs on.
"
Fahrenheit is the thing I'm trying to get up next, which is casting-dependent, so it's one of those. I'm out to somebody at the moment, fingers crossed, because, boy, do I want to make that movie. I'm not giving up. I'll die in the traces before I don't make that movie ... It's not one of those movies that are vastly expensive by any contemporary standard, but money is still money, and it's of a price that requires somebody that will justify that investment. This is definitely going to be more than
The Mist, so those other considerations do come into play."
You can go crazy wondering just who that Big Actor who can pull in the money and box office might be. Could it be someone that rumors have long attached, like Tom Hanks (Darabont's pick for years), Brad Pitt, or Tom Cruise? Or could we be looking at someone newly bankable, like Johnny Depp?
Posted Jun 27th 2009 10:32AM by Cinematical staff
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Fandom, Newsstand

With
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen absolutely demolishing the box office this week (it took in another $28 million on Thursday),
Variety reports that DreamWorks is looking to pick up the film rights to the first book in an as-yet-unpublished six-book series for Michael Bay to produce and potentially direct. The book, titled
I Am Number Four, tells of a group of earthbound alien teens who escaped their planet just as another hostile species was destroying it. Now, as they attempt to settle in and build new lives for themselves on earth, the main character discovers that he is being hunted by the same enemy that blew up his home planet.
Read more at SciFi SquadPosted Jun 26th 2009 1:02PM by Monika Bartyzel
Filed under: Horror, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Trailers and Clips

Over
two years ago,
Ethan Hawke decided to change things up and go for some vampiric fare by grabbing
Daybreakers -- a vampire movie set in the future, and not exactly his normal genre. Now, finally, Yahoo has the trailer, which you can watch after the jump (or right
here).
Hawke plays a researcher in 2019 named Edward Dalton. Some pesky plague has turned most of the world's population into vampires, and humans are at the edge of extinction. But seeing that vamps sort of rely on human blood, they've got to farm the remaining humans to keep up their food source, or find a blood substitute. But it isn't a wasteland of chaos -- the vamps are leaders, cops, you name it. As the supply decreases, a rogue crew finds a way to cure vampirism and possibly save the human race, and they enlist Dalton to help.
The trailer has its goofy moments, and I really don't get Hawke's hat-topped getup, but dare I say: this movie looks fun. It's got the teeth and the usual vampiric snarling, but even better -- it's got a twist that hasn't been overused to the point of insanity. There's no teen romance, no vamp/wolf combo. It even plays on our expectations -- this future isn't a post-apocalyptic wasteland of blood, but one that continues societal structures. And best of all, we've got Willem Dafoe getting creepy again as one of the rogues. That's enough for me. You? The film will hit screens on January 8, 2010.
Continue reading A Trailer for Ethan Hawke's Vampy 'Daybreakers'
Posted Jun 26th 2009 12:02PM by Cinematical staff
Filed under: Music & Musicals, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Fandom, Obits
One of the things us genre fans remember most about Michael was his love of sci-fi and fantasy. It oozed out of almost everything he touched, and as visionary filmmakers like James Cameron and George Lucas began making advancements in special effects during the 1980s, Jackson was right there, incorporating his talents into the most memorable music videos of our generation.
Here, SciFi Squad's Mike Moody remembers Jackson's love of sci-fi and comics, and points to some really great content from around the web as all of us come together today to mourn the loss of a pop-culture legend. Michael Jackson, the king of pop, whose music left an indelible mark on the popular music landscape,
died yesterday at the age of 50. It seemed there was little about Jackson's life that didn't make the news or tabloids throughout his long career, with the possible exception of his love of science fiction and comic books.
Jackson was a huge comic book fan, and even considered buying Marvel Comics in the 1990s. MTV Splashpage looks at Jackson's
history with comics, and notes that the pop star owned a giant collection of superhero books, costumes and statues that recently went up for auction. Comics Alliance has a rundown on Jackson's
5 greatest moments in comics, including his last public trip to a comic shop and the fate of his
Moonwalker comic.
Read more at SciFi SquadPosted Jun 26th 2009 11:02AM by Elisabeth Rappe
Filed under: Classics, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Newsstand, Peter Jackson, Politics
Ever since it was first published in 1954-1955, J.R.R. Tolkien's
Lord of the Rings has been embroiled in politics, much to the dismay of its author. Proponents of the political left and the right have taken turns deriding or laying claim to the fantasy epic. Peter Jackson's film adapation didn't escape political scrutiny either.
Time magazine's Richard Corliss did a
rather famous review of
The Two Towers claiming that the film now evoked the War On Terror, and that Saruman looked "eerily" like Osama bin Laden, and
USA Today's Michael Medved insisted
Viggo Mortensen had tainted the role of Aragorn because he openly declared his anti-war sentiments.
The latest political controversy that the series finds itself embroiled in is the Iranian electoral protests.
Time has a piece from an anonymous Iranian resident reporting that the government is using film to try and quell public unrest. "In normal times, Iranian television usually treats its viewers to one or two Hollywood or European movie nights a week. But these are not normal times, so it's been two or three such movies a day. It's part of the push to keep people at home and off the streets, to keep us busy, to get us out of the regime's hair. The message is 'Don't worry, be happy.'"
All television channels in Iran are owned by the state, so the government is choosing its films very carefully. One of their offerings has been a
Lord of the Rings marathon, ostensibly picked because its length and epic content will keep people glued to their television. "We're glued to the trilogy. We are riveted. A child in the room loudly predicts that
Lord of the Rings will put an end to the nightly shouts, that people will not take to the rooftops and windows because this film will keep them occupied."
Continue reading Iranian Protestors Inspired By 'Lord of the Rings'
Next Page >